Analytics, predictive models and dashboards built around the crop, the client and the decision being made.
A soil moisture value is not an instruction. Converting one into the other requires knowing the crop stage, the soil profile, the weather ahead and what the operator can actually do about it.
We do not ship one dashboard to every client. A sugar mill monitoring supplier plots, a university running a replicated trial and a single farm need different screens, different alerts and different exports. Each is built rather than configured.
Beyond live monitoring we take on discrete analysis work: deriving calibration curves for a new soil type, cleaning and structuring historical sensor datasets, and building the models behind an advisory service.
Model confidence is stated alongside every prediction. Where a model has not been validated for a crop or region, we say so rather than extrapolating. An advisory that is confidently wrong costs a farmer a season.
Yes. We regularly ingest data from third-party sensors, weather services and satellite sources alongside our own.
Yes. Institutional and enterprise deployments include API access to their own data.
Yes, and for farmer-facing deployments we recommend it. Alerts in particular should be in the operator's own language.
Send the constraint you are working within — budget, timeline, soil type, site conditions — and we will tell you what is realistic.